(NEW YORK) -- Monday marks the start date of a major class action lawsuit, in which dozens of officers, lawmakers, scholars, and alleged victims are expected to testify about the New York Police Department's stop-and-frisk policy.
Stop-and-frisk, which allows police to conduct random pat-downs of those they deem suspicious, has been called discriminatory by a number of civil rights groups, including the NAACP and NYCLU, who say black and Hispanic men are targeted disproportionately due to their race.
The overwhelming majority of stops in New York City involve minorities (84 percent in 2011), and 9 out of 10 stops made last year did not lead to an arrest or a summons.
Still, the NYPD and its supporters say stop-and-frisk is an effective crime-fighting tool and a means of getting illegal guns and drugs off the street.
Whether or not the stop-and-frisk policy has contributed to reduced crime rates is up for debate, as crime rates have fallen in many big cities that don't employ the policy. There were 531,159 people stopped in 2012, five times the number of stops made a decade ago when Mayor Michael Bloomberg took office. There were also only 419 murders last year -- the lowest number since at least the 1960s.
As other cities, like Oakland, Calif., consider establishing stop-and-frisk-like policies, New York City's ruling on the issue could have implications for the spread of the practice on a national level.
Some who have experienced the stop-and-frisk policy first hand describe it as discriminatory and degrading. A dozen plaintiffs who say they were targeted under the policy due to their race are expected to testify in coming weeks.
Copyright 2013 ABC News Radio